<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Custom Report on Traffic Origin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wacb.pedia.ch/archives/34/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wacb.pedia.ch/archives/34</link>
	<description>Just another weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://wacb.pedia.ch/archives/34/comment-page-1#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wacb.pedia.ch/?p=34#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Hi

The report will still work, but only one of both parameters will be considered.

I tested your example, and the result was WT.mc_id.

I tried to play with parameter order in the URL and the regexp, as well as removing leading and trailing ".*" and the results seem quite random.

Looking a bit closer, I suspect that the choice of the extracted portion of the URL depends on the regexp's greedyness, meaning that the "biggest match" (even if not all of it is finally extracted) will determine the result.

Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p>
<p>The report will still work, but only one of both parameters will be considered.</p>
<p>I tested your example, and the result was WT.mc_id.</p>
<p>I tried to play with parameter order in the URL and the regexp, as well as removing leading and trailing &#8220;.*&#8221; and the results seem quite random.</p>
<p>Looking a bit closer, I suspect that the choice of the extracted portion of the URL depends on the regexp&#8217;s greedyness, meaning that the &#8220;biggest match&#8221; (even if not all of it is finally extracted) will determine the result.</p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OG</title>
		<link>http://wacb.pedia.ch/archives/34/comment-page-1#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>OG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wacb.pedia.ch/?p=34#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Hi,

what if we have a SEM campaign using both and still we wanted to use this report?

assume that we have ?WT.srch=1&amp;WT.mc_id=aaa

Any thoughts?

thx
OG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>what if we have a SEM campaign using both and still we wanted to use this report?</p>
<p>assume that we have ?WT.srch=1&amp;WT.mc_id=aaa</p>
<p>Any thoughts?</p>
<p>thx<br />
OG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

